![]() |
![]() |
|
|
||||||
|
General E46 Forum
This is the place to get answers, opinions and everything you need related to your E46 (sedan, coupe, convertible and wagon) BMW! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
On eas it shows V710 Weight: 24.0lbs Front 24.5lbs Rear I think the reason is the 225/255, i was running 225 on stock 17.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Registered User
|
so its kinda like having fat chicks in ur car?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Registered User
|
Hmm 24.0/24.5 doesn't seem too bad. I didn't think the stock 17's would be much lighter. I have 96's as well and was thinking of going to some 18" CSLs. The 255's will be heavier than the 225 for sure though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Registered User
|
hum..dont know. Never had one in mine.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
I screwed up and can't post
|
Tires are heavier as well. It makes a major difference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Registered User
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Registered User
|
It varies so much between brands and models, and usually the difference is pretty big too. Like, the 225/45-17 General UHP's my car came with are around 21lbs each while my 235/40-18 Michelin Pilot Sports are a full 3 lbs heavier in terms of listed weights. Weights of the wheels on the scales seem to agree with this. So even though I got lighter forged wheels that were an inch bigger in dimeter, I lost almost all of the weight advantage with the new tires.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Registered User
|
I guess it really is a bit of a blessing having ~20lb wheels then
__________________
- Matt
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
I screwed up and can't post
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Registered User
|
yea. o well
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Registered User
|
If anyone was interested in weights of OEM wheels, heres a decent website.
http://felgenkatalog.auto-treff.com/
__________________
- Matt
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
I screwed up and can't post
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
It's interesting you've seen such a dramatic change in gas mileage. I have big, heavy rim, 19" HM2s and I still get 29mpg on the highway. Does the horsepower of a 330 over a 325 make that much difference?
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Registered User
|
I have, for American purposes, a small engine in my 323ci, and am rolling on 19"s, but I have no complaints, can still easily reach 200km/hr, and am faster off the line than most...if I wanted serious hp numbers, I'd have gone with an M3.
__________________
"Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, your body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming, "Woo hoo! What a ride!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Registered User
|
WARNING!!! GEEK SPEAK BELOW! MAY NOT BE SUITABLE FOR THE SIMPLE MINDED!
When determining the effects of wheels on your car's acceleration, you cannot look at weight alone. The more important factor if the "mass moment of inertia" of the wheel/tire setup. By going with larger wheels, you are moving some mass farther away from the point of rotation. Think of an ice skater doing that spin move (whatever it's called, I'm not ghey). As they bring their arms in toward thier body, the speed up because their mass moment of inertia decreases. Larger wheels have the effect of the skater extending their arms out, thereby slowing down their rotation. If the difference was proportional to the diameter, then you wouldn't see a difference in rolling speed because the larger circumference would make up for the decrease in angular rotation. But that's not case. The mass moment of inertia is proportional to the SQUARE of the diameter. The result is slower acceleration from a larger wheel even if the weight of the wheels being compared are the same. (mass moment of intertia)=((mass)*(diameter)^2)/8 Tires have the same effect, although you have to consider the inner diameter as well. If you also increase tire width then you are increasing the weight of the tire as well as the diameter, thereby putting the double whammy on your mass moment of inertia. (mass moment of intertia)=((mass)*((outer diameter)^2)-((inner diameter)^2))/8 So the next time you see someone rolling on chrome 22s, you have another reason to ![]() footnote: I have intentionally used both mass and weight interchangeably to keep with the original terminology of the thread. I hope that doesn't confuse anyone.
__________________
sig courtesy of CSL323 |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Registered User
|
V710's is my first pick for upgrade wheels but I've been holding it off for a while. Does anyone knows what's the weigh for the ZHP wheel and the Hamann 18x8.5 PG2's I've been using aftermarket wheels since I bought the car so I haven't track the gas mileage
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Registered User
|
My ZHP wheels front weight 24.7 and the rear 26.2 so the V710's is not that bad consider aftermarket wheels. Also we need to take into count the weight of the tires you choose.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
![]() and this thread just makes me want Kosei's even more. 16.8lbs and 17x8.5 ftmfw. or if your real concerned with the weight, get the 16x7's, they are 15lbs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
So the real world target is somewhere between 18.4 and 20.4 lbs.
__________________
sig courtesy of CSL323 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| power, wheels |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|